Supreme Court and the Voting Rights Act
The Supreme Court has heard oral arguments on a case that questions the use of race in drawing congressional maps, potentially violating the Constitution.
This decision could significantly impact the Voting Rights Act of 1965, rendering it less effective.
to injure no man, but to bless all mankind
as stated by Mary Baker Eddy, founder of The First Church of Christ, Scientist, which owns The Monitor.
About The Monitor
The Monitor has been publishing award-winning journalism since 1908, driven by a mission to uplift the world by seeking solutions and finding reasons for credible hope.
- Transparent ownership by The First Church of Christ, Scientist
- Journalism not driven by commercial influences
- Seeking solutions and finding reasons for credible hope
The shaping and quelling of international conflicts can feel like the exclusive province of the powerful.
Author's summary: The Supreme Court's decision may diminish the Voting Rights Act.
More News
- Ally vs. SoFi® [2025]: More Account Options or Higher APYs
- DP World takes its Clubhouse initiative to India to help grow the game
- HILL, THOMPSON: Taxpayers should know how much their municipal governments spend
- A Closer Look at the Fujifilm GFX ETERNA 55's Color Science
- Did Qatari Money Drive Trump’s Push for Gaza Ceasefire?
- Savings Bond: FG raises N3.96 billion in October offer
- Takeaways: Ottawa Senators take it on the chin in 8-4 loss to Buffalo Sabres
- 7 Films To Watch During Homecoming | Essence
- Dan's Daily: Players Get a Raise; No Expansion; Are Penguins Behind?
- Bari Weiss isn't capturing the media. She's being captured.